Next time some apocalyptic bore starts yapping about how facebook causes cancer pull out your copy of Small, Moody et al. or Small & Vorgan’s iBrain and show the audience that brain scans demonstrate how middle-aged and older adults with little Internet experience were able to trigger key centres in the brain that control decision-making and complex reasoning after just one week of surfing the Web.
I supose this was expected. The Susan Greenfield story is going through the usual dance moves, with the old media and new media playing their typecast roles (Radio 4, so I’ve heard, balanced and sensible. well, surprise).
So, some of the good coverage I’ve seen so far:
Aleks Krotoski has seen it all before, but can’t avoid four poignant comments and a few good links.
Ben Goldacre gives the story the solid bad science treatment it deserves, and pointing us to
I have to quote:
He points out the Dr Sigman quoted a 1998 paper called “The Internet Paradox”. This paper did indeed find a (weak) relationship between internet use and depression, loneliness, etc. This was 1998, at the very dawn of widespread use of the web, but more importantly, the very same authors went back and looked at the very same families, and found that the effect had disappeared. That seems relevant to me, especially if you’re going to quote the 1998 results, Dr Sigman?
You can read the paper in full online as a pdf. It says “This sample generally experienced positive effects of using the Internet on communication, social involvement, and well-being.”
There is no excuse for not knowing about this finding. Type the internet paradox into Google. Go on, do it:
Flessisgrass shares some notes from a recent talk Susan Greenfeld gave at the Jewish book week, giving us a glimpse at what she might have actually said at the Lords’ (as opposed to what the DM reported).
February 25, 2009 Posted by yishaym | neuroscience, Social Software | Aleks Krotoski, Ben Goldacre, Clay Shirky, Daily mail, facebook, neuroscience, Nick Carr, Susan Greenfeld, twitter | Leave a comment
My other blog is a mess. This one is where I’ll keep the stuff that has anything to do with learning, technology and design.
Its about stuff that’s designed for learning, but also about we are designed for learning by the intelligent process of evolution.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.
- It’s out! Our edited book: Practical Design Patterns for Teaching and Learning with Technology
- Talk next Wednesday: Design inquiry of learning, the learning design studio, and a vision for future learning and teaching environments
- Resource cloud for MobiLearnFest
- Steven Warburton’s “Tintin” model of PPW and LDS
- Webinar on the “Art and Science of Learning Design” special issue
edtech - theory | An… on Innovating Pedagogy 2012 Pedagogy, Technology… on Innovating Pedagogy 2012 Derek Jones on phenomenology, representation,… Derek Jones on phenomenology, representation,… Derek Jones on phenomenology, representation,…
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- April 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- March 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- April 2010
- March 2010
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- 12,442 hits
guten tagacceleration Adele Botha africa african assessment bluetooth CAL09 cal09ptns Caroline Daly case studies Christian Kohls Clay Shirky computer science constructionism CSCL danah boyd design design based research design divide design patterns design science Diana Laurillard Dylan Wiliam e-learning edid9 Education ethnomathematics facebook formative assessment formative e-Assessment fractals games games learning video cognitve performance research psychlogy cognition Graham Brown-Martin handheldlearning Harvey Mellar hhl hhl08 interaction design interactive media James Clay knight news challenge learning learning design learning patterns Linux LKL London Knowledge Lab mathematics mlearning mobile learning mobiles mooc neuroscience Norbert Pachler open source pattern language network phd planet pleasecallme programming prophets and explorers publications report research scratch small worlds network Social Software Steve Wheeler StimulusWatch.org talk TEL twitter Ubuntu Web 2.0
- How Useful is Twitter for Learning in Massive Communities? An Analysis of two MOOCs
- eLearning papers, Issue No.37 Experiences and best practices in and around MOOCs
- Innovating pedagogy 2012: Exploring new forms of teaching, learning and assessment, to guide educators and policy makers
- The pedagogy of the Massive Open Online Course MOOC: the UK view
- Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming
- MOOCs and the funnel of participation
- Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014
- Learning design studio: educational practice as design inquiry of learning
- Towards an Integrated Model of Teacher Inquiry into Student Learning, Learning Design and Learning Analytics
- The Art and Science of Learning Design: Editoral
- Participatory Pattern Workshops: A Methodology for Open Collaborative Construction of Design Knowledge in Education
- Context is What We Take For Granted: Addressing Context in Design-Centric Teacher Training
- A Design Approach to Research in Technology Enhanced Mathematics Education
- How to ruin a MOOC? JISC RSC Yorkshire & the Humber Online Conference 2013 December 1, 2013
- How to ruin a mooc November 29, 2013
- Towards an Integrated Model of Teacher Inquiry into Student Learning, Learning Design and Learning Analytics August 1, 2013
- What the research says: Design Inquiry of Learning July 26, 2013