Innovating Pedagogy 2012
The OU’s Innovating Pedagogy report seems to be generating a lot of interest.
In case you haven’t seen it yet:
The series of reports explores new forms of teaching, learning and assessment for an interactive world, to guide teachers and policy makers in productive innovation.
The first report proposes ten innovations that are already in currency but have not yet had a profound influence on education:
3 Comments »
Leave a Reply
Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.Recent Comments
twot?- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- iLook
- iRead
- Are we predictive engines? Perils, prospects, and the puzzle of the porous perceiver
- What else can brains do?
- Interactively human: Sharing time, constructing materiality
- Maximal mutual information, not minimal entropy, for escaping the “Dark Room”
- Perception versus action: The computations may be the same but the direction of fit differs
- Bayesian animals sense ecological constraints to predict fitness and organize individually flexible reproductive decisions
- Affect and non-uniform characteristics of predictive processing in musical behaviour
- iWrite
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
- slideshare
- OLDS MOOC Week 7: Formative evaluation paper February 17, 2013
- Design narratives February 13, 2013
- Week7 intro evaluate January 7, 2013
- The Pedagogical Patterns Collector User Guide November 23, 2012
[...] Innovating Pedagogy 2012 (designedforlearning.wordpress.com) [...]
Pingback by Putting Pedagogy Before Technology | Doug Woods | November 19, 2012 |
[...] Innovating Pedagogy 2012 (designedforlearning.wordpress.com) [...]
Pingback by Pedagogy, Technology and the Search for Inspiration | Doug Woods | January 9, 2013 |
[...] Share designedforlearning.wordpress.com 1 month [...]
Pingback by edtech - theory | Annotary | January 17, 2013 |